Does the Centre Hold? Testing Palma's Proposition (A Comment) / Hazledine, Tim.
By: Hazledine, Tim
Material type: ArticlePublisher: 2014Description: 1409 - 1415Subject(s): Palma Ratio | Income Distribution | Developing Economies In: Development and ChangeSummary: This Comment tests empirically the important proposition made by Palma in this journal (Development and Change, 2011) that deciles 5 to 9 of the income distribution across developing economies have been able to secure and defend a stable share (around 50 per cent) of the total available income, so that changes in income inequality are now a matter of struggle between the top 10 per cent and the bottom 40 per cent of the population, ranked by income. The author finds that the proposition does not hold: changes in top 10 per cent shares are matched by changes in the shares of both the other cohorts.Item type | Current location | Call number | Vol info | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Articles | Ahmedabad (HO) | (Browse shelf) | Vol. 45, Issue. 6 | Available | 018930 |
This Comment tests empirically the important proposition made by Palma in this journal (Development and Change, 2011) that deciles 5 to 9 of the income distribution across developing economies have been able to secure and defend a stable share (around 50 per cent) of the total available income, so that changes in income inequality are now a matter of struggle between the top 10 per cent and the bottom 40 per cent of the population, ranked by income. The author finds that the proposition does not hold: changes in top 10 per cent shares are matched by changes in the shares of both the other cohorts.
There are no comments on this title.