Abstract:
In India the majority of businesses are in the dominant control of the families. It is estimated that 90% of the
business in India is controlled by families (Gupta 2018). Most of the big corporate business houses like Tatas,
Ambanis, Birlas, Godrej, Wadias, Munjals, Mahindra, Thapars, Mittals, Shaparji Paollonji, Jindals, Adanis,
Anil Aggarwal – Vedanta, Bajaj, Ruias, Ranbaxy, Times of India and many more are all controlled by
families. The role of family and the family patriarch is quite important in India. As business transits from
being entrepreneurial to being professional, professionalization of top management leadership family business
assumes great significance. However, the success of professionalization depends on, to what extent the
business culture (values, norms, goals, relations) remain intact with introduction of professionally managed
systems (human resource systems), thus affecting the financial condition (profitability, market share, product
lines) of the business to remain on the growth trajectory. The main problem with the dominant view on
professional management is the way it downplays social and cultural contextual particularities especially in
those family businesses where family relations, norms, and values are crucial to the workings and
development of the business. Therefore, it becomes important to assess whether introducing non-family
professional expertise in top management leadership while retaining minimum share of ownership with family
members helps the family business or not. With this objective, the current paper strives to investigate whether
the decision of family members to share the control and systems to non-family appointed top management
helps the family business in the long run.
Description:
Thirteenth Biennial Conference on Entrepreneurship/ Edited by Sasi Misra, Sunil Shukla, Ganapathi Batthini