A comparison of public and charter school board governance i states Ford, Michael R.
By: Ford, Michael R
Material type: ArticlePublisher: 2015Description: 403 - 416 In: Nonprofit Management & LeadershipSummary: In this article we compare the governance behaviors and preferences of nonprofit charter school board members with traditional elected public school board members in Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin. Using originally collected survey data, we find that nonprofit charter school board members are less likely to place emphasis on relations with the public, engage in conflict, be ideologically diverse, and perceive the executive as responsible for key governance tasks than traditionally elected public school board members. The findings provide new information for policymakers weighing the potential benefits of education privatization through the use of nonprofit charter schools against the potential loss of democratic board accountability.Item type | Current location | Call number | Vol info | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Articles | Ahmedabad (HO) | (Browse shelf) | Vol. 25, Issue. 4 | Available | 020407 |
In this article we compare the governance behaviors and preferences of nonprofit charter school board members with traditional elected public school board members in Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin. Using originally collected survey data, we find that nonprofit charter school board members are less likely to place emphasis on relations with the public, engage in conflict, be ideologically diverse, and perceive the executive as responsible for key governance tasks than traditionally elected public school board members. The findings provide new information for policymakers weighing the potential benefits of education privatization through the use of nonprofit charter schools against the potential loss of democratic board accountability.
There are no comments on this title.